Melhores podcasts sobre SCOTUS (2024)

1
Macquarie Infrastructure v. Moab Partners (SEC Disclosure) 6:55

20h ago6:55

6:55

Macquarie Infrastructure Corporation owns a subsidiary that operates terminals to store bulk liquid commodities, including No. 6 fuel oil, which has almost 3% sulfer. The UN adopted IMO in 2016, which set in in 2020. This regulation capped the sulfur content on fuel oil used in shipping to 0.5%. Macquarie did not discuss this IMO in its public docu…

1
Part 3: Trump v. United States | Brief for the United States 29:36

5d ago29:36

29:36

Today I'll be reading Special Counsel Jack Smith's Brief for the United States in Donald Trump v. United States (filed April 8, 2024) - the Supreme Court case in which Donald Trump asserts that presidents have absolute criminal immunity. The brief is 49 pages long, so I will be recording it in several segments. If you are interested in listening to…

1
Abortion, Immunity, and Originalism 36:24

19d ago36:24

36:24

This week the Court heard oral arguments in the high-profile case challenging the Food and Drug Administration's expansion of access to the abortion drug mifepristone. GianCarlo discusses that case, oral arguments, and the mess of standing doctrine. After that, Zack interviews Professor John Yoo who gives his expert take on the Trump immunity case …

1
Bissonnette v. LePage Bakeries (Federal Arbitration Act) 5:45

4d ago5:45

5:45

Flowers makes baked goods that are then distributed across the country. Bissonnette owned the distribution rights in a certain part of the country. Their contract subjected them to the F.A.A.. After Bissonnette sued under Labor (wage) laws, Flowers moved to compel arbitration. Bissonnette said they're exempt because the F.A.A. exempts “contracts of…

1
Part 2: Trump v. United States | Brief for the United States 23:19

6d ago23:19

23:19

Today I'll be reading Special Counsel Jack Smith's Brief for the United States in Donald Trump v. United States (filed April 8, 2024) - the Supreme Court case in which Donald Trump asserts that presidents have absolute criminal immunity. If you are interested in listening to the oral arguments in this case, they are scheduled to take place later th…

1
Part 1: Trump v. United States | Brief for the United States 32:35

7d ago32:35

32:35

Today I'll be reading Special Counsel Jack Smith's Brief for the United States in Donald Trump v. United States (filed April 8, 2024) - the Supreme Court case in which Donald Trump asserts that presidents have absolute criminal immunity. The brief is 49 pages long, so I will be recording it in several segments. If you are interested in listening to…

1
Part 2: U.S. v. Trump | DOJ Response to Judge Cannon's Jury Instructions Order (Documents Case) 20:20

12d ago20:20

20:20

Listen to Special Counsel Jack Smith's April 2, 2024 filing responding to Judge Cannon's order requiring preliminary proposed jury instructions and verdict forms on counts 1-32. If you need a quick explainer on the Presidential Records Act, check out mine. Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us wherever you get podcasts. WhatSCOTUSWroteUs.com…

1
Part 1: U.S. v. Trump | DOJ Response to Judge Cannon's Jury Instructions Order (Documents Case) 30:00

12d ago30:00

30:00

Listen to Special Counsel Jack Smith's April 2, 2024 filing responding to Judge Cannon's order requiring preliminary proposed jury instructions and verdict forms on counts 1-32. If you need a quick explainer on the Presidential Records Act, check out mine. Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us wherever you get podcasts. WhatSCOTUSWroteUs.com…

1
Lindke v. Freed | Social Media, Public Officials, First Amendment 33:19

14d ago33:19

33:19

When does a public official’s social media activity constitute state action subject to the First Amendment? Listen to the unanimous opinion of the Supreme Court in Lindke v. Freed (March 15, 2024) and find out. Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us wherever you get podcasts. WhatSCOTUSWroteUs.comPor Pippah Getchell

1
Pulsifer v. United States - Post-Decision SCOTUScast 17:53

21d ago17:53

17:53

On March 15, 2024, the Supreme Court issued its ruling in Pulsifer v. United States. The Supreme Court considered an Eighth Circuit case that raised the question: "Must a defendant show he does not meet any of the criteria listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f) to qualify for a sentence lower than the statutory minimum?" At issue was the meaning of the word…

1
Proper Property Rights 48:33

26d ago48:33

48:33

This term is shaping up to be a big one for free speech cases. The Court heard arguments in three such cases this week and handed down decisions in other cases involving public officials blocking people on social media, the FBI's No-Fly-List, and the meaning of the word "and." Your hosts discuss those cases, and then GianCarlo interviews Robert McN…

1
FBI v. Fikre (No Fly List) 6:46

27d ago6:46

6:46

Respondent Yonas Fikre, a U. S. citizen and Sudanese emigree, brought suit alleging that the government placed him on the No Fly List unlawfully. In his complaint, Mr. Fikre alleged that he traveled from his home in Portland, Oregon to Sudan in 2009 to pursue business opportunities there. At a visit to the U. S. embassy, two FBI agents informed Mr.…

1
Wilkinson v. Garland (Immigration) 8:00

27d ago8:00

8:00

Wilkinson v. Garland Congress gives immigration judges discretionary power to cancel the removal of a noncitizen and instead permit the noncitizen to remain in the country lawfully. 8 U. S. C. §§1229b(a)–(b). An IJ faced with an application for cancellation of removal proceeds in two steps: The IJ must decide first whether the noncitizen is eligibl…

1
Garland v. Cargill - Post-Argument SCOTUScast 47:11

27d ago47:11

47:11

On February 28, 2024, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Garland v. Cargill. The Court considered whether bump stocks are considered "machineguns" as defined by Title 26 of the United States Code. Please join us as we break down and analyze how oral argument went before the Court. Featuring: Stephen Halbrook, Senior Fellow, Independent Instit…

1
Trump v. Anderson - Post-Decision SCOTUScast 17:20

27d ago17:20

17:20

On March 4, 2024, the Supreme Court issued its ruling in Trump v. Anderson. At issue was whether the Colorado Supreme Court erred in ordering former President Donald Trump excluded from the 2024 presidential primary ballot; the Court held that Colorado did err in excluding Trump from the ballot. Join us to hear Professor Muller break down the decis…

1
O'Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier (Public Official Social Media) 4:29

28d ago4:29

4:29

O'Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier In 2014, Michelle O’Connor-Ratcliff and T. J. Zane created public Facebook pages to promote their campaigns for election to the Poway Unified School District (PUSD) Board of Trustees. While O’Connor-Ratcliff and Zane (whom we will call the Trustees) both had personal Facebook pages that they shared with friends and fami…

1
Lindke v. Freed (Public Official Social Media) 9:11

28d ago9:11

9:11

James Freed, like countless other Americans, created a private Facebook profile sometime before 2008. He eventually converted his profile to a public “page,” meaning that anyone could see and comment on his posts. In 2014, Freed updated his Facebook page to reflect that he was appointed city manager of Port Huron, Michigan, describing himself as “D…

1
Pulsifer v. United States (Statutory Construction / Sentencing) 8:55

29d ago8:55

8:55

PULSIFER v. UNITED STATES No. 22–340. Argued October 2, 2023—Decided March 15, 2024 After pleading guilty to distributing at least 50 grams of methamphetamine, petitioner Mark Pulsifer faced a mandatory minimum sentence of 15 years in prison. At sentencing, he sought to take advantage of the “safety valve” provision of federal sentencing law, which…

1
Rehearing: Justice Caleb Stegall 36:00

1M ago36:00

36:00

In this Rehearings episode, we replay our interview with Kansas Supreme Court Justice Caleb Stegall. Rehearings airs our favorite old interviews on weeks when things are otherwise quiet at the Supreme Court. Follow us on Twitter @scotus101 and @tzsmith. And please send questions, comments, or ideas for future episodes to scotus101@heritage.org. Don…

1
Trump v. Anderson 37:20

1M ago37:20

37:20

This was a big week for former president Trump who prevailed in Trump v. Anderson against an attempt to remove him from the ballot in Colorado. Your hosts dive deep into that decision unpacking the majority opinion, the debate among the concurring justices, and the case's short- and long-term implications. After that, GianCarlo interviews Ninth Cir…

1
Concurrences, Trump v. Anderson | Colorado Republican Primary Ballot 14:07

1M ago14:07

14:07

Today I'll be reading both concurring opinions (which read like dissents) in Donald J. Trump v. Norma Anderson et al., decided March 4, 2024.Por Pippah Getchell

1
Trump v. Anderson (Per Curiam -- Majority) 24:31

1M ago24:31

24:31

Trump v. Anderson A group of Colorado voters contends that Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution prohibits former President Donald J. Trump, who seeks the Presidential nomination of the Republican Party in this year’s election, from becoming President again. The Colorado Supreme Court agreed with that contention. It ordered the …

1
Trump v. Anderson (Sotomayor, Kagan, Jackson Concurrence) 11:02

1M ago11:02

11:02

Trump v. Anderson JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR, JUSTICE KAGAN, and JUSTICE JACKSON, concurring in the judgment. "“If it is not necessary to decide more to dispose of a case, then it is necessary not to decide more.” Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, 597 U. S. 215, 348 (2022) (ROBERTS, C. J., concurring in judgment). That fundamental principle of j…

1
Trump v. Anderson (Barrett Concurrence) 1:42

1M ago1:42

1:42

Trump v. Anderson DONALD J. TRUMP, PETITIONER v. NORMA ANDERSON, ET AL. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO [March 4, 2024] JUSTICE BARRETT, concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. I join Parts I and II–B of the Court’s opinion. I agree that States lack the power to enforce Section 3 against Presidential candidates. Th…

1
Trump v. Anderson | Colorado Republican Primary Ballot 27:07

1M ago27:07

27:07

Today I'll be reading the per curiam opinion of the Court in Donald J. Trump v. Norma Anderson et al., decided March 4, 2024.Por Pippah Getchell

1
Coalition for TJ v. Fairfax County School Board | Alito, Dissenting, Denial of Cert (Race, School Admissions) 17:38

1M ago17:38

17:38

Alito, joined by Thomas, dissenting from denial of certiorari in Coalition for TJ v. Fairfax County School Board, decided Feb 20, 2024.Por Pippah Getchell

1
How to Sue the Feds 39:33

2M ago39:33

39:33

This week brings the Court another Trump-related lawsuit and a bevy of high-profile oral arguments. Among those, the NetChoice cases, which will decide to what extent states can stop social media companies from censoring users because of their political views. Your hosts discuss those cases and a handful of others that challenge the powers of admin…

1
Update and Mini Rant: Trump v. United States 3:43

2M ago3:43

3:43

An update with critical commentary regarding today's order granting certiorari in Trump v. United States (from a very unhappy host).Por Pippah Getchell

1
Great Lakes Insurance v. Raiders Retreat Realty | Choice-of-Law Provisions in Maritime Contracts 27:11

2M ago27:11

27:11

Today I'll be reading the unanimous opinion of the Court in Great Lakes Insurance SE v. Raiders Retreat Realty Co., LLC, decided Feb 21, 2024.Por Pippah Getchell

1
McElrath v. Georgia | Double Jeopardy, Repugnancy Doctrine 18:03

2M ago18:03

18:03

Justice Jackson delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court in McElrath v. Georgia (Feb 21, 2024)Por Pippah Getchell

1
Missouri Dept. of Corrections v. Finney | Justice Alito Statement, Denial of Cert 9:10

2M ago9:10

9:10

"Americans who do not hide their adherence to traditional religious beliefs about homosexual conduct will be 'labeled as bigots and treated as such' by the government," wrote Justice Alito, in his statement explaining why he concurred in the denial of certiorari in Missouri Dept. of Corrections v. Finney (February 20, 2024).…

1
Rehearing: Judge Paul Kelly Jr. 29:18

2M ago29:18

29:18

In this Rehearings episode, we replay our interview with Judge Paul Kelly, Jr.. Rehearings airs our favorite old interviews on weeks when things are otherwise quiet at the Supreme Court. Follow us on Twitter @scotus101 and @tzsmith. And please send questions, comments, or ideas for future episodes to scotus101@heritage.org. Don't forget to leave a …

1
McElrath v. Georgia (Double Jeopardy) 5:31

2M ago5:31

5:31

MCELRATH v. GEORGIA Damian McElrath was charged with malice murder, felony murder, and aggravated assault -- all related to the death of his mother. A jury returned a split verdict. For the malice-murder charge, finding him “not guilty by reason of insanity” and “guilty but mentally ill” to the other counts. The Georgia Supreme Court stated that be…

1
Great Lakes Insurance v. Raiders Retreat Realty (Maritime Contract) 6:40

2M ago6:40

6:40

Great Lakes v. Raiders Great Lakes Insurance (organized in Germany and HQ in UK) entered into a maritime insurance contract with Raiders Retreat Realty Company (HQ in PA). The contract included a provision to apply New York law. A Raiders vessel had an incident in Florida, Raiders then filed a claim. Great Lakes filed for declaratory judgment in a …

1
Smith v. Hamm | Sotomayor, Dissenting from Denials of Stay and Certiorari (Execution by Nitrogen Hypoxia) 9:39

2M ago9:39

9:39

Justice Sotomayor, dissenting from the denial of application for stay and denial of certiorari in Smith v. Hamm (January 25, 2024). Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us anywhere you get your podcastsPor Pippah Getchell

1
Rehearing: Judge John Nalbandian 28:06

2M ago28:06

28:06

In this Rehearings episode, we replay our interview with the Judge John Nalbandian. Rehearings airs our favorite old interviews on weeks when things are otherwise quiet at the Supreme Court. Follow us on Twitter @scotus101 and @tzsmith. And please send questions, comments, or ideas for future episodes to scotus101@heritage.org. Don't forget to leav…

1
Dept. of Agriculture Rural Development Rural Housing Service v. Kirtz | Fair Credit Reporting Act; Federal Government Sovereign Immunity 42:13

2M ago42:13

42:13

The brand-new, unanimous opinion of the Court in Dept. of Agriculture Rural Development Rural Housing Service v. Kirtz, decided February 8, 2024. Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us anywhere you get your podcastsPor Pippah Getchell

1
Murray v. USB Securities | Whistleblower Protection 31:20

2M ago31:20

31:20

Today I'll be reading the brand-new, unanimous opinion of the Court in Murray v. USB Securities (Feb 8, 2024) regarding the whistleblower provision of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Listen to What SCOTUS Wrote Us anywhere you get your podcastsPor Pippah Getchell

1
Trump v. Anderson & Class Action Madness 46:00

2M ago46:00

46:00

This week brings us the biggest oral argument of the term: Trump v. Anderson, which will decide whether states can disqualify President Trump from the ballot. Your hosts recap the complicated legal issues and explore oral arguments. Zack and GianCarlo also discuss the two opinions released this week, which involve whistleblower protections and suin…

1
Trump v. Anderson 2:09:04

2M ago2:09:04

2:09:04

Did the Colorado Supreme Court err in ordering President Trump excluded from the 2024 presidential primary ballot?

1
Murray v. UBS Securities, LLC (Whistleblower / Retaliatory Discharge) 7:55

2M ago7:55

7:55

TREVOR MURRAY, PETITIONER v. UBS SECURITIES, LLC, ET AL. As part of Trevor Murray's job at UBS, he had to file reports to the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC). In these reports, he had to certify that the reports reflected his personal and independent views. Despite physical separation from the rest of the unit, Murray claimed that he was recei…

1
USDA v. Kirtz (Fair Credit Reporting Act / Sovereign Immunity) 10:00

2M ago10:00

10:00

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE RURAL DEVELOPMENT RURAL HOUSING SERVICE v. KIRTZ Reginald Kirtz obtained a loan from the Department of Agriculture Rural Development Rural Housing Service. According to Kirtz, the USDA later told one of the major credit agencies (TransUnion) that Kirtz was behind on his payments. Kirtz says this was false and these false s…

Podcasts que valem a pena ouvir

Podcasts sobre SCOTUS

Podcasts que valem a pena ouvir

Guia rápido de referências