Americas Credit Union's Asks NCUA for Authority to Pay Childcare Costs for Board Members

Credit Union Regulatory Guidance Including: NCUA, CFPB, FDIC, OCC, FFIEC

Hello, this is Samantha Shares. This episode covers America’s Credit Union’s Letter to the National Credit Union Administration’s Board on Permitting Childcare Expenses as Reimbursable

The following is an audio version of that letter and the press release. This podcast is educational and is not legal advice. We are sponsored by Credit Union Exam Solutions Incorporated, whose team has over two hundred and Forty years of National Credit Union Administration experience. We assist our clients with N C U A so they save time and money. If you are worried about a recent, upcoming or in process N C U A examination, reach out to learn how they can assist at Mark Treichel DOT COM. Also check out our other podcast called With Flying Colors where we provide tips on how to achieve success with N C U A.

And now the letter.

RE: Permitting Childcare Expenses as Reimbursable Under 12 CFR 701 point 33

Dear Chairman Harper, Vice Chairman Hauptman, and Board Member Oatska:

On behalf of America’s Credit Unions, I am writing to request the National Credit Union Administration (the agency) explicitly permit reimbursement of childcare related costs incurred by a federal credit union (F C U) board member. While the term “childcare” is used throughout this letter, our ask is that child and other non-child dependent care expenses be reimbursable America’s Credit Unions is the voice of consumers’ best option for financial services: credit unions. We advocate for policies that allow the industry to effectively meet the needs of their nearly on hundred forty million members nationwide.

Credit unions stand out from banks in a variety of ways, including our emphasis on diversity, equity, and inclusion. This is, in part, evident in the prevalence of and increasing percentage of women, not only in senior level positions, but also at the board level. Based on data from the THE AGENCY and analyzed by America’s Credit Unions, the percentage of women board members has increased by roughly five percentage points among all asset ranges since at least twenty twelve.

This is a testament to the work of our industry to achieve greater gender equity in leadership.

Further, we are proud to have a regulator in the THE AGENCY that similarly emphasizes the importance of equality in the credit union industry. We applaud the focus of the THE AGENCY Board, as well as staff, including those in the agency’s Office of Minority and Women Inclusion. We appreciate the Board’s recent willingness to pursue actionable items to address ongoing challenges among credit unions, such as those related to the agency’s records preservation program. Our request below is another great opportunity for the Board to take action to achieve a sensical change to the agency’s regulations.

We ask the THE AGENCY to update its existing regulation pertaining to reimbursement of F C U officials. Specifically, we ask the Board to amend section 701 point 33 to allow F C U board members to be reimbursed for the cost of childcare when it is necessary in order to attend an official board meeting of the F C U. Family structures and childcare responsibilities are significantly different now than when this provision was last amended. To attract new talent, people with young children should be afforded the opportunity to more easily participate on a credit union board with appropriate reimbursement for their childcare expenses.

|
| |

The Federal Credit Union Act (F C U Act) provides sufficient latitude for the Board to pursue such an amendment. While section 1761(c) of the Act generally limits compensation to a single board member, it explicitly states that “the reimbursement of reasonable expenses incurred in the execution of the duties of the position shall not be considered compensation.”3 This provision of the Act is implemented by section 701 point 33(b) of the agency’s regulations, which, consistent with the Act, states that compensation specifically excludes:

Payment (by reimbursement to an official . . . ) for reasonable and proper costs incurred by an official in carrying out the responsibilities of the position to which that person has been elected or appointed, if the payment is determined by the board of directors to be necessary or appropriate in order to carry out the official business of the credit union, and is in accordance with written policies and procedures, including documentation requirements, established by the board of directors. Such payments may include the payment of travel costs for officials and one guest per official[.]4

In particular, we ask the Board to update the existing limitation in section 701 point 33(b)(2)(i). This could be achieved by simply inserting “childcare” into the last sentence of section 701 point 33(b)(2)(i) as follows: “Such payments may include the payment of childcare or travel costs for officials and one guest per official[.]”

The AGENCY last updated the provision regarding the definition of “compensation” over twenty-two years ago. In that update, the agency used its expansive statutory authority to add the travel expenses of a guest as reimbursable under section 701 point 33(b). Previously, reimbursement was limited to the travel expenses of the board member’s “immediate family member.” In so doing, the Board stated its belief that amending this provision would “allow F C Us greater flexibility to accommodate the needs of officials whose duties include business-related travel.” While we are fortunate to now live in a world where virtual meetings are ubiquitous, there continue to be instances where in-person meetings are necessary, including in the context of certain F C U board meetings. Such meetings cause attendees to incur not only direct travel-related expenses, such as fuel, but also indirect expenses, such as costs associated with securing childcare for a board member’s family.

Section 701 point 33(b)(2)(i) offers just a single example of what might be considered a reasonable and proper reimbursable cost. The example is clearly not intended as an exhaustive list of permissible expenses, given the regulation’s use of “may.” We believe the cost associated with childcare is more similar to travel than other expenses the agency has indicated are not reimbursable under this section. Assuming a virtual meeting is not an option, the only way for a board member to attend a meeting is to physically travel to the meeting location. The only option for a board member to attend a board meeting is to ensure his or her child or dependent has proper care, which in many situations, absent the presence of another family member or trusted

caregiver, requires utilizing a paid caregiver. This concern and expense is amplified for any single parent or head of hou...