))
Examining the Swiss Women's Victory in Landmark Climate Case
Série arquivada ("Feed inativo " status)
When?
This feed was archived on August 21, 2024 13:31 (
Why? Feed inativo status. Nossos servidores foram incapazes de recuperar um feed de podcast válido por um período razoável.
What now? You might be able to find a more up-to-date version using the search function. This series will no longer be checked for updates. If you believe this to be in error, please check if the publisher's feed link below is valid and contact support to request the feed be restored or if you have any other concerns about this.
Manage episode 411668651 series 3564935
Conteúdo fornecido por Eric Cochran. Todo o conteúdo do podcast, incluindo episódios, gráficos e descrições de podcast, é carregado e fornecido diretamente por Eric Cochran ou por seu parceiro de plataforma de podcast. Se você acredita que alguém está usando seu trabalho protegido por direitos autorais sem sua permissão, siga o processo descrito aqui https://pt.player.fm/legal.
In this episode, we into the controversial topic of climate change as a human rights issue following a groundbreaking climate ruling by the European Court of Human Rights.
The judgment accuses Switzerland of violating the human rights of more than 2,000 Swiss women by not adequately addressing climate change, drawing a wave of support from various environmental groups and potentially setting a precedent for similar lawsuits across Europe. However, Sasha and Eric question the appropriateness of international human rights courts as venues to handle the global issue of climate change.
The hosts scrutinize the use of courts like the ECHR to deliver what they believe to be "performative politics" rather than protecting fundamental human rights. They delve into potential ramifications of the tendency to frame climate change as a human rights issue, arguing the possibility of trivializing the concept of human rights.
While climate change is undeniably a serious challenge, Sasha and Eric suggest that the focus should be on people facing severe oppression, violence, and injustice. They express their worry that such court rulings may misdirect attention from truly oppressed victims to those claiming victim status due to climate-change-induced discomforts.
The episode unfolds further with a critical examination of Europe's efforts to combat climate change, with the hosts accusing the activist class of seeking perfection over progress and suggesting that such cases reveal more about this class rather than climate change itself.
An intense discussion follows, weighing the potential benefits and drawbacks of using legal pressure to force governments into climate action. The episode concludes with a powerful plea to maintain balance in the pursuit of drastic action against climate change, in a way that it does not trivialize the principles of justice and human rights.
Join Sasha and Eric on this intriguing episode of the Sandstorm podcast as they navigate the complex challenges and opportunities at the intersection of climate change, human rights, and legal accountability.
47 episódios
Compartilhar
