))
"COVID-19: A Second Opinion" - Part 1
Manage episode 318720982 series 3300996
Conteúdo fornecido por Jason Phibbs. Todo o conteúdo do podcast, incluindo episódios, gráficos e descrições de podcast, é carregado e fornecido diretamente por Jason Phibbs ou por seu parceiro de plataforma de podcast. Se você acredita que alguém está usando seu trabalho protegido por direitos autorais sem sua permissão, siga o processo descrito aqui https://pt.player.fm/legal.
Since this event was only available by video and difficult to load, I made it available via podcast for greater access.
Background
On January 24, 2022, U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) held a panel discussion, COVID 19: A Second Opinion. A group of world renowned doctors and medical experts provided a different perspective on the global pandemic response, the current state of knowledge of early and hospital treatment, vaccine efficacy and safety, what went right, what went wrong, what should be done now, and what needs to be addressed long term.
Reference Outline
- Dr. Peter McCullough intro and opening statement - 10:00-16:00
- Dr. Ryan Cole intro and opening statement - 16:00-20:00
- Dr. Harvey Risch intro and proof of Hydroxy efficacy - 20:00-26:30
- Dr. Pierre Kory intro and proof of Ivermectin efficacy - 27:35-37:15
- Dr. Richard Urso and ability to treat w/o HCQ and IVER - 37:20-44:15
- Question: Why aren't Dr.'s treating COVID? - 44:15-45:50
- Question: How many Dr.'s present received censorship? - 47:00-47:36
- Dr. Christina Parks on spike protein toxicity and impact on blacks - 47:36-52:45
- Dr. Mary Boden, regular physician's perspective - 52:45-57:35
- Dr. Harpel Mangat - 57:45-continued in Part 2
24 episódios
Compartilhar
