Artwork

Conteúdo fornecido por Smriti Mehta and Daniël Lakens, Smriti Mehta, and Daniël Lakens. Todo o conteúdo do podcast, incluindo episódios, gráficos e descrições de podcast, é carregado e fornecido diretamente por Smriti Mehta and Daniël Lakens, Smriti Mehta, and Daniël Lakens ou por seu parceiro de plataforma de podcast. Se você acredita que alguém está usando seu trabalho protegido por direitos autorais sem sua permissão, siga o processo descrito aqui https://pt.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Aplicativo de podcast
Fique off-line com o app Player FM !

Episode 19: Quantifauxcation

1:18:33
 
Compartilhar
 

Manage episode 380403312 series 3449375
Conteúdo fornecido por Smriti Mehta and Daniël Lakens, Smriti Mehta, and Daniël Lakens. Todo o conteúdo do podcast, incluindo episódios, gráficos e descrições de podcast, é carregado e fornecido diretamente por Smriti Mehta and Daniël Lakens, Smriti Mehta, and Daniël Lakens ou por seu parceiro de plataforma de podcast. Se você acredita que alguém está usando seu trabalho protegido por direitos autorais sem sua permissão, siga o processo descrito aqui https://pt.player.fm/legal.

In this episode, we discuss Quantifauxcation, described by statistician Philip Stark as “situations in which a number is, in effect, made up, and then is given credence merely because it is quantitative.” We give examples of quantifauxcation in psychology, including errors of the third kind. We spend the second half of the podcast discussing how to develop quantitative measures that are meaningful and bridge the divide between qualitative and quantitative observations.

Shownotes

  • Burgess, E. W. (1927). Statistics and case studies as methods of sociological research, Vol 12(3), 103-120. (Thanks to Andy Grieve!)
  • Blog by Tania Lombrozo on nonsensical formulas in abstracts.
  • Type III errors: Philip Stark’s post of Deborah Mayo’s blog
  • Wilson, M. (2023). Constructing measures: An item response modeling approach. Taylor & Francis.
  • Wilson, M., Bathia, S., Morell, L., Gochyyev, P., Koo, B. W., & Smith, R. (2022). Seeking a better balance between efficiency and interpretability: Comparing the likert response format with the Guttman response format. Psychological Methods. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000462
  • Bhatti, H.A., Mehta, S., McNeil, R., Wilson, M. (2023). A scientific approach to assessment: Rasch measurement and the four building blocks. In X. Liu & W. Boone (Eds.), Advances in Applications of Rash Measurement in Science Education. Springer Nature.

  continue reading

60 episódios

Artwork

Episode 19: Quantifauxcation

Nullius in Verba

17 subscribers

published

iconCompartilhar
 
Manage episode 380403312 series 3449375
Conteúdo fornecido por Smriti Mehta and Daniël Lakens, Smriti Mehta, and Daniël Lakens. Todo o conteúdo do podcast, incluindo episódios, gráficos e descrições de podcast, é carregado e fornecido diretamente por Smriti Mehta and Daniël Lakens, Smriti Mehta, and Daniël Lakens ou por seu parceiro de plataforma de podcast. Se você acredita que alguém está usando seu trabalho protegido por direitos autorais sem sua permissão, siga o processo descrito aqui https://pt.player.fm/legal.

In this episode, we discuss Quantifauxcation, described by statistician Philip Stark as “situations in which a number is, in effect, made up, and then is given credence merely because it is quantitative.” We give examples of quantifauxcation in psychology, including errors of the third kind. We spend the second half of the podcast discussing how to develop quantitative measures that are meaningful and bridge the divide between qualitative and quantitative observations.

Shownotes

  • Burgess, E. W. (1927). Statistics and case studies as methods of sociological research, Vol 12(3), 103-120. (Thanks to Andy Grieve!)
  • Blog by Tania Lombrozo on nonsensical formulas in abstracts.
  • Type III errors: Philip Stark’s post of Deborah Mayo’s blog
  • Wilson, M. (2023). Constructing measures: An item response modeling approach. Taylor & Francis.
  • Wilson, M., Bathia, S., Morell, L., Gochyyev, P., Koo, B. W., & Smith, R. (2022). Seeking a better balance between efficiency and interpretability: Comparing the likert response format with the Guttman response format. Psychological Methods. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000462
  • Bhatti, H.A., Mehta, S., McNeil, R., Wilson, M. (2023). A scientific approach to assessment: Rasch measurement and the four building blocks. In X. Liu & W. Boone (Eds.), Advances in Applications of Rash Measurement in Science Education. Springer Nature.

  continue reading

60 episódios

كل الحلقات

×
 
Loading …

Bem vindo ao Player FM!

O Player FM procura na web por podcasts de alta qualidade para você curtir agora mesmo. É o melhor app de podcast e funciona no Android, iPhone e web. Inscreva-se para sincronizar as assinaturas entre os dispositivos.

 

Guia rápido de referências