Artwork

Conteúdo fornecido por David Provan. Todo o conteúdo do podcast, incluindo episódios, gráficos e descrições de podcast, é carregado e fornecido diretamente por David Provan ou por seu parceiro de plataforma de podcast. Se você acredita que alguém está usando seu trabalho protegido por direitos autorais sem sua permissão, siga o processo descrito aqui https://pt.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Aplicativo de podcast
Fique off-line com o app Player FM !

Ep. 123: Is risk a science or a feeling?

59:21
 
Compartilhar
 

Manage episode 432664550 series 2571262
Conteúdo fornecido por David Provan. Todo o conteúdo do podcast, incluindo episódios, gráficos e descrições de podcast, é carregado e fornecido diretamente por David Provan ou por seu parceiro de plataforma de podcast. Se você acredita que alguém está usando seu trabalho protegido por direitos autorais sem sua permissão, siga o processo descrito aqui https://pt.player.fm/legal.

From the perceived control in everyday activities like driving, to the dread associated with nuclear accidents, we discuss how emotional responses can sometimes skew our rational assessments of risk. Finally, we explore the ethical and practical challenges of balancing emotional and analytical approaches in risk communication, especially in high-stakes scenarios like terrorism and public safety. The conversation touches on real-world examples, such as the aftermath of the September 11 attacks and the controversial discussions around gun ownership. We emphasize the importance of framing and narrative in conveying risk information effectively, ensuring that it resonates with and is clearly understood by diverse audiences.

Discussion Points:

  • Understanding risk perception, Paul Slovic's work and how it has shaped safety practices and decisions in everyday life
  • “Affect heuristic” in decision making, influenced by emotions and past experiences, leading to inconsistencies in risk perception.
  • Feeling in-control vs. “scary concepts”, risks are perceived differently due to emotions, control, and misunderstandings of probabilities, as seen in driving
  • Risks are assessed differently based on probabilities, outcomes, framing, and context, influencing decision-making
  • Other studies, looking at how people see risk, assessing your personal fear or risk from causes of death from cancer to stroke to car accidents to shark attacks vs. your own bathroom
  • Balance between emotional and analytical risk evaluation
  • Math and statistical examples of how risk is presented and perceived
  • Post 9/11 terrorist fears vs. statistics
  • Ethical considerations in communication, and challenges in conveying risk information
  • Takeaways
  • The answer to our episode’s question: “the short answer is both”
  • Like and follow, send us your comments and suggestions!

Quotes:

“Risk is analysis where we bring logic, reason, and science or data or facts, and bring it to bear on hazard management.” - David

“There may not be a perfect representation of any risk.” - Drew

“If that's the important bit, then blow it up to the entire slide and get rid of the diagram and just show us the important bit.”- Drew

“It's probably a bit unfair on humans to say that using feeling and emotion isn't a rational thing to do.” - David

“The authors are almost saying here that for some types of risks and situations, risk as a feeling is great.” - David

Resources:

The Paper: Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings: Some thoughts about Affect, Reason, Risk and Rationality

The Safety of Work Podcast

The Safety of Work on LinkedIn

Feedback@safetyofwork

  continue reading

125 episódios

Artwork
iconCompartilhar
 
Manage episode 432664550 series 2571262
Conteúdo fornecido por David Provan. Todo o conteúdo do podcast, incluindo episódios, gráficos e descrições de podcast, é carregado e fornecido diretamente por David Provan ou por seu parceiro de plataforma de podcast. Se você acredita que alguém está usando seu trabalho protegido por direitos autorais sem sua permissão, siga o processo descrito aqui https://pt.player.fm/legal.

From the perceived control in everyday activities like driving, to the dread associated with nuclear accidents, we discuss how emotional responses can sometimes skew our rational assessments of risk. Finally, we explore the ethical and practical challenges of balancing emotional and analytical approaches in risk communication, especially in high-stakes scenarios like terrorism and public safety. The conversation touches on real-world examples, such as the aftermath of the September 11 attacks and the controversial discussions around gun ownership. We emphasize the importance of framing and narrative in conveying risk information effectively, ensuring that it resonates with and is clearly understood by diverse audiences.

Discussion Points:

  • Understanding risk perception, Paul Slovic's work and how it has shaped safety practices and decisions in everyday life
  • “Affect heuristic” in decision making, influenced by emotions and past experiences, leading to inconsistencies in risk perception.
  • Feeling in-control vs. “scary concepts”, risks are perceived differently due to emotions, control, and misunderstandings of probabilities, as seen in driving
  • Risks are assessed differently based on probabilities, outcomes, framing, and context, influencing decision-making
  • Other studies, looking at how people see risk, assessing your personal fear or risk from causes of death from cancer to stroke to car accidents to shark attacks vs. your own bathroom
  • Balance between emotional and analytical risk evaluation
  • Math and statistical examples of how risk is presented and perceived
  • Post 9/11 terrorist fears vs. statistics
  • Ethical considerations in communication, and challenges in conveying risk information
  • Takeaways
  • The answer to our episode’s question: “the short answer is both”
  • Like and follow, send us your comments and suggestions!

Quotes:

“Risk is analysis where we bring logic, reason, and science or data or facts, and bring it to bear on hazard management.” - David

“There may not be a perfect representation of any risk.” - Drew

“If that's the important bit, then blow it up to the entire slide and get rid of the diagram and just show us the important bit.”- Drew

“It's probably a bit unfair on humans to say that using feeling and emotion isn't a rational thing to do.” - David

“The authors are almost saying here that for some types of risks and situations, risk as a feeling is great.” - David

Resources:

The Paper: Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings: Some thoughts about Affect, Reason, Risk and Rationality

The Safety of Work Podcast

The Safety of Work on LinkedIn

Feedback@safetyofwork

  continue reading

125 episódios

Todos os episódios

×
 
Loading …

Bem vindo ao Player FM!

O Player FM procura na web por podcasts de alta qualidade para você curtir agora mesmo. É o melhor app de podcast e funciona no Android, iPhone e web. Inscreva-se para sincronizar as assinaturas entre os dispositivos.

 

Guia rápido de referências