Artwork

Conteúdo fornecido por Gastroenterology and Endoscopy. Todo o conteúdo do podcast, incluindo episódios, gráficos e descrições de podcast, é carregado e fornecido diretamente por Gastroenterology and Endoscopy ou por seu parceiro de plataforma de podcast. Se você acredita que alguém está usando seu trabalho protegido por direitos autorais sem sua permissão, siga o processo descrito aqui https://pt.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Aplicativo de podcast
Fique off-line com o app Player FM !

The Cold vs. Hot Snare Polypectomy Debate

5:02
 
Compartilhar
 

Manage episode 433015454 series 3591778
Conteúdo fornecido por Gastroenterology and Endoscopy. Todo o conteúdo do podcast, incluindo episódios, gráficos e descrições de podcast, é carregado e fornecido diretamente por Gastroenterology and Endoscopy ou por seu parceiro de plataforma de podcast. Se você acredita que alguém está usando seu trabalho protegido por direitos autorais sem sua permissão, siga o processo descrito aqui https://pt.player.fm/legal.

In this in-depth episode, we dive headfirst into one of the most polarizing topics in modern gastrointestinal medicine - the heated debate between cold snare polypectomy (CSP) and hot snare polypectomy (HSP) techniques.
Our host provides a comprehensive overview of these two pivotal polyp removal methods, exploring their pros, cons, and appropriate use cases. We learn about:
• The fundamentals of CSP and HSP
• European guideline recommendations for each technique based on polyp size
• Comparative data on complete resection rates and complication profiles
• Managing challenges like bleeding and tissue injury
• The critical importance of polyp retrieval and histopathological analysis
• Potential future advancements in endoscopic tools and techniques
• Adhering to best practices and clinical guidelines
Key Takeaways:
- CSP shows a superior safety profile for diminutive (<5mm) and small (6-9mm) sessile polyps
- HSP provides coagulation benefits for larger polyps (10-20mm) and bleeding control
- Both methods demonstrate comparable resection completeness for 4-10mm polyps
- HSP carries higher risks like delayed bleeding and deep thermal injury
- Polyp retrieval quality is high with both techniques for accurate diagnosis
- Technique choice depends on balancing polyp factors and patient needs
- Ongoing research and new technologies will further refine polypectomy
Whether you're a seasoned endoscopist or just getting started, this episode provides invaluable insights into optimizing polypectomy outcomes through the judicious application of CSP and HSP. Join us as we unpack this critical clinical debate.
Links:


https://www.gastroendopod.com

  continue reading

23 episódios

Artwork
iconCompartilhar
 
Manage episode 433015454 series 3591778
Conteúdo fornecido por Gastroenterology and Endoscopy. Todo o conteúdo do podcast, incluindo episódios, gráficos e descrições de podcast, é carregado e fornecido diretamente por Gastroenterology and Endoscopy ou por seu parceiro de plataforma de podcast. Se você acredita que alguém está usando seu trabalho protegido por direitos autorais sem sua permissão, siga o processo descrito aqui https://pt.player.fm/legal.

In this in-depth episode, we dive headfirst into one of the most polarizing topics in modern gastrointestinal medicine - the heated debate between cold snare polypectomy (CSP) and hot snare polypectomy (HSP) techniques.
Our host provides a comprehensive overview of these two pivotal polyp removal methods, exploring their pros, cons, and appropriate use cases. We learn about:
• The fundamentals of CSP and HSP
• European guideline recommendations for each technique based on polyp size
• Comparative data on complete resection rates and complication profiles
• Managing challenges like bleeding and tissue injury
• The critical importance of polyp retrieval and histopathological analysis
• Potential future advancements in endoscopic tools and techniques
• Adhering to best practices and clinical guidelines
Key Takeaways:
- CSP shows a superior safety profile for diminutive (<5mm) and small (6-9mm) sessile polyps
- HSP provides coagulation benefits for larger polyps (10-20mm) and bleeding control
- Both methods demonstrate comparable resection completeness for 4-10mm polyps
- HSP carries higher risks like delayed bleeding and deep thermal injury
- Polyp retrieval quality is high with both techniques for accurate diagnosis
- Technique choice depends on balancing polyp factors and patient needs
- Ongoing research and new technologies will further refine polypectomy
Whether you're a seasoned endoscopist or just getting started, this episode provides invaluable insights into optimizing polypectomy outcomes through the judicious application of CSP and HSP. Join us as we unpack this critical clinical debate.
Links:


https://www.gastroendopod.com

  continue reading

23 episódios

Todos os episódios

×
 
Loading …

Bem vindo ao Player FM!

O Player FM procura na web por podcasts de alta qualidade para você curtir agora mesmo. É o melhor app de podcast e funciona no Android, iPhone e web. Inscreva-se para sincronizar as assinaturas entre os dispositivos.

 

Guia rápido de referências

Ouça este programa enquanto explora
Reproduzir