Player FM - Internet Radio Done Right
44 subscribers
Checked 8d ago
Adicionado há oito anos atrás
Conteúdo fornecido por Lisa Parmley, USPTO Patent Practitioner #51006, Lisa Parmley, and USPTO Patent Practitioner #51006. Todo o conteúdo do podcast, incluindo episódios, gráficos e descrições de podcast, é carregado e fornecido diretamente por Lisa Parmley, USPTO Patent Practitioner #51006, Lisa Parmley, and USPTO Patent Practitioner #51006 ou por seu parceiro de plataforma de podcast. Se você acredita que alguém está usando seu trabalho protegido por direitos autorais sem sua permissão, siga o processo descrito aqui https://pt.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Aplicativo de podcast
Fique off-line com o app Player FM !
Fique off-line com o app Player FM !
Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast
Marcar/Desmarcar tudo como reproduzido ...
Manage series 1537034
Conteúdo fornecido por Lisa Parmley, USPTO Patent Practitioner #51006, Lisa Parmley, and USPTO Patent Practitioner #51006. Todo o conteúdo do podcast, incluindo episódios, gráficos e descrições de podcast, é carregado e fornecido diretamente por Lisa Parmley, USPTO Patent Practitioner #51006, Lisa Parmley, and USPTO Patent Practitioner #51006 ou por seu parceiro de plataforma de podcast. Se você acredita que alguém está usando seu trabalho protegido por direitos autorais sem sua permissão, siga o processo descrito aqui https://pt.player.fm/legal.
Patent Bar Review
…
continue reading
310 episódios
Marcar/Desmarcar tudo como reproduzido ...
Manage series 1537034
Conteúdo fornecido por Lisa Parmley, USPTO Patent Practitioner #51006, Lisa Parmley, and USPTO Patent Practitioner #51006. Todo o conteúdo do podcast, incluindo episódios, gráficos e descrições de podcast, é carregado e fornecido diretamente por Lisa Parmley, USPTO Patent Practitioner #51006, Lisa Parmley, and USPTO Patent Practitioner #51006 ou por seu parceiro de plataforma de podcast. Se você acredita que alguém está usando seu trabalho protegido por direitos autorais sem sua permissão, siga o processo descrito aqui https://pt.player.fm/legal.
Patent Bar Review
…
continue reading
310 episódios
Todos os episódios
×P
Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1 MPEP Q & A 322: What type of Demand will prevent an international application designating the U.S. to enter? 2:26
2:26
Mais Tarde
Mais Tarde
Listas
Like
Curtido2:26
Question: What type of Demand will prevent an international application designating the U.S. to enter the national stage via the U.S. Designated Office? Answer: An international application designating the U.S. will enter the national stage via the U.S. Designated Office unless a Demand electing the U.S. is filed under PCT Article 31 whereupon entry will be via […] The post MPEP Q & A 322: What type of Demand will prevent an international application designating the U.S. to enter? appeared first on Patent Education Series .…
P
Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1 MPEP Q & A 321: What are the factual inquiries related to obviousness? 3:41
3:41
Mais Tarde
Mais Tarde
Listas
Like
Curtido3:41
Question: What are the factual inquiries related to obviousness that the Court enunciates? Answer: Obviousness is a question of law based on underlying factual inquiries. The factual inquiries enunciated by the Court are as follows: (A) Determining the scope and content of the prior art; (B) Ascertaining the differences between the claimed invention and the […] The post MPEP Q & A 321: What are the factual inquiries related to obviousness? appeared first on Patent Education Series .…
P
Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1 MPEP Q & A 320: What are the three types of designs interpreted by case law to include? 2:22
2:22
Mais Tarde
Mais Tarde
Listas
Like
Curtido2:22
Question: What are the three types of designs the language “new, original and ornamental design for an article of manufacture” has been interpreted by the case law to include? Answer: The language “new, original and ornamental design for an article of manufacture” has been interpreted by the case law to include at least three kinds of designs: […] The post MPEP Q & A 320: What are the three types of designs interpreted by case law to include? appeared first on Patent Education Series .…
P
Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1 MPEP Q & A 319: What must any assignment-related document for patent matters submitted by facsimile include? 2:11
2:11
Mais Tarde
Mais Tarde
Listas
Like
Curtido2:11
Question: What three items must any assignment-related document for patent matters submitted by facsimile include? Answer: Any assignment-related document for patent matters submitted by facsimile must include: (A) an identified application or patent number; (B) one cover sheet to record a single transaction; and (C) payment of the recordation fee by a credit card, is […] The post MPEP Q & A 319: What must any assignment-related document for patent matters submitted by facsimile include? appeared first on Patent Education Series .…
P
Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1 MPEP Q & A 318: Requirements of an oath or declaration under section 37 CFR 1.63. 2:39
2:39
Mais Tarde
Mais Tarde
Listas
Like
Curtido2:39
Question: Name two requirements of an oath or declaration under section 37 CFR 1.63? Answer: An oath or declaration under section 37 CFR 1.63 must: (1) Identify the inventor or joint inventor executing the oath or declaration by his or her legal name; (2) Identify the application to which it is directed; (3) Include a […] The post MPEP Q & A 318: Requirements of an oath or declaration under section 37 CFR 1.63. appeared first on Patent Education Series .…
P
Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1 MPEP Q & A 317: How can you determine whether the original patent requirement is satisfied in a reissue application? 3:02
3:02
Mais Tarde
Mais Tarde
Listas
Like
Curtido3:02
Question: How can you determine whether the original patent requirement is satisfied in a reissue application? Answer: Examiners should review the reissue application to determine whether the original patent requirement is satisfied, by considering if: (A) the claims presented in the reissue application are described in the original patent specification and enabled by the original […] The post MPEP Q & A 317: How can you determine whether the original patent requirement is satisfied in a reissue application? appeared first on Patent Education Series .…
P
Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1 MPEP Q & A 316: Is it ever necessary to change the inventorship named in the application? 3:52
3:52
Mais Tarde
Mais Tarde
Listas
Like
Curtido3:52
Question: If an application by joint inventors includes more than one independent and distinct invention, and restriction is required, is it ever necessary to change the inventorship named in the application? Answer: If an application by joint inventors includes more than one independent and distinct invention, and restriction is required, it may become necessary to […] The post MPEP Q & A 316: Is it ever necessary to change the inventorship named in the application? appeared first on Patent Education Series .…
P
Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1 MPEP Q & A 315: List examples of situations that confirm a “real world” context of use. 3:11
3:11
Mais Tarde
Mais Tarde
Listas
Like
Curtido3:11
Question: List two examples of situations that require or constitute carrying out further research to identify or reasonably confirm a “real world” context of use and, therefore, do not define “substantial utilities.” Answer: The following are examples of situations that require or constitute carrying out further research to identify or reasonably confirm a “real world” […] The post MPEP Q & A 315: List examples of situations that confirm a “real world” context of use. appeared first on Patent Education Series .…
P
Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1 MPEP Q & A 314: What will the request indicate for each patent and printed publication cited in the request? 3:30
3:30
Mais Tarde
Mais Tarde
Listas
Like
Curtido3:30
Question: When an examiner concludes that no substantial new question of patentability has been raised, they will prepare a decision denying the reexamination request. What will that request indicate for each patent and printed publication cited in the request? Answer: If the examiner concludes that no substantial new question of patentability has been raised, the […] The post MPEP Q & A 314: What will the request indicate for each patent and printed publication cited in the request? appeared first on Patent Education Series .…
P
Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1 MPEP Q & A 313: Reasons why the Office will withdraw the application from issue. 2:19
2:19
Mais Tarde
Mais Tarde
Listas
Like
Curtido2:19
Question: Once the issue fee has been paid, list two reasons why the Office will withdraw the application from issue at its own initiative. Answer: Once the issue fee has been paid, the Office will not withdraw the application from issue at its own initiative for any reason except: (1) A mistake on the part […] The post MPEP Q & A 313: Reasons why the Office will withdraw the application from issue. appeared first on Patent Education Series .…
P
Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1 MPEP Q & A 312: List two General Plastic non-exclusive factors. 3:18
3:18
Mais Tarde
Mais Tarde
Listas
Like
Curtido3:18
Question: List two General Plastic non-exclusive factors. Answer: The General Plastic non-exclusive factors include the following: Whether the same petitioner previously filed a petition directed to the same claims of the same patent; Whether at the time of filing of the first petition the petitioner knew of the prior art asserted in the second petition […] The post MPEP Q & A 312: List two General Plastic non-exclusive factors. appeared first on Patent Education Series .…
P
Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1 MPEP Q & A 311: Two requirements for a petition for suspension of action under 37 CFR 1.103(a) 3:23
3:23
Mais Tarde
Mais Tarde
Listas
Like
Curtido3:23
Question: List two requirements for a petition for suspension of action under 37 CFR 1.103(a). Answer: A petition for suspension of action under 37 CFR 1.103(a) must: (A) be presented as a separate paper; (B) be accompanied by the petition fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(g); (C) request a specific and reasonable period of suspension not greater than […] The post MPEP Q & A 311: Two requirements for a petition for suspension of action under 37 CFR 1.103(a) appeared first on Patent Education Series .…
P
Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1 MPEP Q & A 310: List two examples of notices issued as part of the pre-examination processing of an application 3:29
3:29
Mais Tarde
Mais Tarde
Listas
Like
Curtido3:29
Question: The three-month period in 37 CFR 1.704(b) applies to the Office notices and letters issued as part of the pre-examination processing of an application (except a Notice of Omitted Items in a Nonprovisional Application as discussed above). List two examples of these notices. Answer: These notices include: A Notice of Incomplete Nonprovisional Application (except as to […] The post MPEP Q & A 310: List two examples of notices issued as part of the pre-examination processing of an application appeared first on Patent Education Series .…
P
Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1 MPEP Q & A 309: List two requirements for adding a “Sequence Listing” after the application filing date? 3:15
3:15
Mais Tarde
Mais Tarde
Listas
Like
Curtido3:15
Question: List two requirements for adding a “Sequence Listing” after the application filing date? Answer: Adding a “Sequence Listing” after the application filing date involves the submission of: a “Sequence Listing” either as a PDF image file, on physical sheets of paper, or as an ASCII plain text file submitted via the USPTO patent electronic […] The post MPEP Q & A 309: List two requirements for adding a “Sequence Listing” after the application filing date? appeared first on Patent Education Series .…
P
Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1 MPEP Q & A 308: What type of arguments should a patent owner preliminary response include? 3:35
3:35
Mais Tarde
Mais Tarde
Listas
Like
Curtido3:35
Question: What type of arguments should a patent owner preliminary response include? Answer: A patent owner preliminary response may include one or more of the following arguments: The petitioner is statutorily barred from pursuing a review; The references asserted to establish that the claims are unpatentable are not in fact printed publications; The prior art […] The post MPEP Q & A 308: What type of arguments should a patent owner preliminary response include? appeared first on Patent Education Series .…
Bem vindo ao Player FM!
O Player FM procura na web por podcasts de alta qualidade para você curtir agora mesmo. É o melhor app de podcast e funciona no Android, iPhone e web. Inscreva-se para sincronizar as assinaturas entre os dispositivos.