Artwork

Conteúdo fornecido por Jean-Michel Abrassart. Todo o conteúdo do podcast, incluindo episódios, gráficos e descrições de podcast, é carregado e fornecido diretamente por Jean-Michel Abrassart ou por seu parceiro de plataforma de podcast. Se você acredita que alguém está usando seu trabalho protegido por direitos autorais sem sua permissão, siga o processo descrito aqui https://pt.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Aplicativo de podcast
Fique off-line com o app Player FM !

Épisode #478: Politique et sciences sociales à l’université : débat (V. Debierre / Vinteuil)

1:43:25
 
Compartilhar
 

Série arquivada ("Feed inativo " status)

When? This feed was archived on November 10, 2020 13:07 (3+ y ago). Last successful fetch was on October 08, 2020 18:27 (3+ y ago)

Why? Feed inativo status. Nossos servidores foram incapazes de recuperar um feed de podcast válido por um período razoável.

What now? You might be able to find a more up-to-date version using the search function. This series will no longer be checked for updates. If you believe this to be in error, please check if the publisher's feed link below is valid and contact support to request the feed be restored or if you have any other concerns about this.

Manage episode 274004755 series 1448619
Conteúdo fornecido por Jean-Michel Abrassart. Todo o conteúdo do podcast, incluindo episódios, gráficos e descrições de podcast, é carregado e fornecido diretamente por Jean-Michel Abrassart ou por seu parceiro de plataforma de podcast. Se você acredita que alguém está usando seu trabalho protegido por direitos autorais sem sua permissão, siga o processo descrito aqui https://pt.player.fm/legal.
Vincent Debierre (du podcast « Liberté Académique: https://soundcloud.com/liberte-academique« ) et Vin Teuil (un des blogueurs du site http://zet-ethique.fr/) nous ont demandés si on pouvait modérer un débat entre eux concernant l’impact des opinions politiques au niveau académique pour les sciences sociales.
Vincent Debierre a écrit le billet suivant :’triple embûche pour les sciences sociales » https://www.telos-eu.com/fr/triple-embuche-pour-les-sciences-sociales.html

Vin Teuil avait souhaité répondre à ce billet pour un autre : « Sur une route pavée d’embûches : mieux comprendre les Sciences Humaines et Sociales » : http://zet-ethique.fr/2020/07/26/sur-une-route-pavee-dembuches-mieux-comprendre-les-sciences-humaines-et-sociales/

Nous avons accepté d’encadrer ce débat.

Voila la liste des références citées par les intervenants (ou citées pour leur influence sur ce qui a été dit) :

– Fairclough, Norman (1989). Language and Power. London: Longman.
– Fairclough, Norman (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
– Fairclough, Norman (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis. Boston: Addison Wesley.
– Fairclough, Norman (2003). Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
The Righteous Mind
Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion (Jonathan Haidt)
Bernard Lahire :
– Pour la sociologie : et pour en finir avec une prétendue « culture de l’excuse », Paris, La Découverte, 2016
– Enfances de classes. De l’inégalité parmi les enfants (dir.), Paris, Seuil, 2019, 1232 p
Sociology’s Sacred Victims and the Politics of Knowledge: Moral Foundations Theory and Disciplinary Controversies (Horowitz & autres)
Science Fictions
Exposing Fraud, Bias, Negligence and Hype in Science (Stuart Richie)
No, Professors Are Not Brainwashing Their Students
On the myth of faculty indoctrination
Academe is Overrun by Liberals. Here’s Why that Should Disturb You
Political diversity will improve social psychological science (Duarte & Al)
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25036715/
Empathizing-systemizing cognitive styles: Effects of sex and academic degree (Leon Kaganovskiy,Simon Baron-Cohen)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0194515
Blueprint
How DNA Makes Us Who We Are (Robert Plomin)
  continue reading

498 episódios

Artwork
iconCompartilhar
 

Série arquivada ("Feed inativo " status)

When? This feed was archived on November 10, 2020 13:07 (3+ y ago). Last successful fetch was on October 08, 2020 18:27 (3+ y ago)

Why? Feed inativo status. Nossos servidores foram incapazes de recuperar um feed de podcast válido por um período razoável.

What now? You might be able to find a more up-to-date version using the search function. This series will no longer be checked for updates. If you believe this to be in error, please check if the publisher's feed link below is valid and contact support to request the feed be restored or if you have any other concerns about this.

Manage episode 274004755 series 1448619
Conteúdo fornecido por Jean-Michel Abrassart. Todo o conteúdo do podcast, incluindo episódios, gráficos e descrições de podcast, é carregado e fornecido diretamente por Jean-Michel Abrassart ou por seu parceiro de plataforma de podcast. Se você acredita que alguém está usando seu trabalho protegido por direitos autorais sem sua permissão, siga o processo descrito aqui https://pt.player.fm/legal.
Vincent Debierre (du podcast « Liberté Académique: https://soundcloud.com/liberte-academique« ) et Vin Teuil (un des blogueurs du site http://zet-ethique.fr/) nous ont demandés si on pouvait modérer un débat entre eux concernant l’impact des opinions politiques au niveau académique pour les sciences sociales.
Vincent Debierre a écrit le billet suivant :’triple embûche pour les sciences sociales » https://www.telos-eu.com/fr/triple-embuche-pour-les-sciences-sociales.html

Vin Teuil avait souhaité répondre à ce billet pour un autre : « Sur une route pavée d’embûches : mieux comprendre les Sciences Humaines et Sociales » : http://zet-ethique.fr/2020/07/26/sur-une-route-pavee-dembuches-mieux-comprendre-les-sciences-humaines-et-sociales/

Nous avons accepté d’encadrer ce débat.

Voila la liste des références citées par les intervenants (ou citées pour leur influence sur ce qui a été dit) :

– Fairclough, Norman (1989). Language and Power. London: Longman.
– Fairclough, Norman (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
– Fairclough, Norman (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis. Boston: Addison Wesley.
– Fairclough, Norman (2003). Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
The Righteous Mind
Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion (Jonathan Haidt)
Bernard Lahire :
– Pour la sociologie : et pour en finir avec une prétendue « culture de l’excuse », Paris, La Découverte, 2016
– Enfances de classes. De l’inégalité parmi les enfants (dir.), Paris, Seuil, 2019, 1232 p
Sociology’s Sacred Victims and the Politics of Knowledge: Moral Foundations Theory and Disciplinary Controversies (Horowitz & autres)
Science Fictions
Exposing Fraud, Bias, Negligence and Hype in Science (Stuart Richie)
No, Professors Are Not Brainwashing Their Students
On the myth of faculty indoctrination
Academe is Overrun by Liberals. Here’s Why that Should Disturb You
Political diversity will improve social psychological science (Duarte & Al)
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25036715/
Empathizing-systemizing cognitive styles: Effects of sex and academic degree (Leon Kaganovskiy,Simon Baron-Cohen)
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0194515
Blueprint
How DNA Makes Us Who We Are (Robert Plomin)
  continue reading

498 episódios

Todos os episódios

×
 
Loading …

Bem vindo ao Player FM!

O Player FM procura na web por podcasts de alta qualidade para você curtir agora mesmo. É o melhor app de podcast e funciona no Android, iPhone e web. Inscreva-se para sincronizar as assinaturas entre os dispositivos.

 

Guia rápido de referências