Artwork

Conteúdo fornecido por Anna Hartman. Todo o conteúdo do podcast, incluindo episódios, gráficos e descrições de podcast, é carregado e fornecido diretamente por Anna Hartman ou por seu parceiro de plataforma de podcast. Se você acredita que alguém está usando seu trabalho protegido por direitos autorais sem sua permissão, siga o processo descrito aqui https://pt.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Aplicativo de podcast
Fique off-line com o app Player FM !

The Controversy Of The Gillet SI Joint Test

51:56
 
Compartilhar
 

Manage episode 438126649 series 3428550
Conteúdo fornecido por Anna Hartman. Todo o conteúdo do podcast, incluindo episódios, gráficos e descrições de podcast, é carregado e fornecido diretamente por Anna Hartman ou por seu parceiro de plataforma de podcast. Se você acredita que alguém está usando seu trabalho protegido por direitos autorais sem sua permissão, siga o processo descrito aqui https://pt.player.fm/legal.

This week on the Unreal Results podcast, I talk about one of my favorite topics - the Gillet SI joint test. Gillet’s test or sometimes known as the March test or Stork test, is typically known for having poor reliability based on previous research. If you’ve been following along for some time, you probably know that said research likes to get thrown around by the EBP police when I make posts on social media. But the often overlooked part of these research studies is that they have lots of flaws and limitations. Make sure you tune into this episode as I break down why the studies on the Gillet test aren’t the best and why I think the SI joint is innately difficult to assess with only one test.
Resources Mentioned In This Episode
Episode 6: The Mysterious, Misunderstood, and Mistreated SI Joint
Episode 10: EBP Police
Episode 54: A Better Way To Assess The SI Joint
Get on the Online LTAP™ Level 1 Waitlist HERE
Research Studies Mentioned
- Intertester Reliability for Selected Clinical Tests of the Sacroiliac Joint
- Inter- and Intra-Examiner Reliability of Palpation for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction
- Inter-Examiner and Intra-Examiner Agreement for Assessing Sacroiliac Anatomical Landmarks Using Palpation and Observation: Pilot Study
- Inter-Examiner and Intra-Examiner Reliability of the Standing Flexion Test
- Reliability of Motion Palpation Procedures to Detect Sacroiliac Joint Fixations
- Intraexaminer and Interexaminer Reliability of the Gillet Test
Upcoming In-Person LTAP™ Courses
LTAP Level 1 in Boston, October 2024

🚨 FREE mini-course: The Missing Link: Learn how ONE change to your assessment can help you get immediate results for your PT and AT clients.
In this training, you will:

  • Learn how to apply the 1st assessment test of the MovementREV LTAP™
  • Discover how to shift perspective from a biomechanical and orthopedic paradigm to a whole organism one that considers the viscera and the nervous system.

=================================================
Watch the podcast on YouTube and subscribe!
Join the MovementREV email list to stay up to date on the Unreal Results Podcast and MovementREV education.
Be social and follow me:
Instagram | Facebook | Twitter | YouTube

  continue reading

79 episódios

Artwork
iconCompartilhar
 
Manage episode 438126649 series 3428550
Conteúdo fornecido por Anna Hartman. Todo o conteúdo do podcast, incluindo episódios, gráficos e descrições de podcast, é carregado e fornecido diretamente por Anna Hartman ou por seu parceiro de plataforma de podcast. Se você acredita que alguém está usando seu trabalho protegido por direitos autorais sem sua permissão, siga o processo descrito aqui https://pt.player.fm/legal.

This week on the Unreal Results podcast, I talk about one of my favorite topics - the Gillet SI joint test. Gillet’s test or sometimes known as the March test or Stork test, is typically known for having poor reliability based on previous research. If you’ve been following along for some time, you probably know that said research likes to get thrown around by the EBP police when I make posts on social media. But the often overlooked part of these research studies is that they have lots of flaws and limitations. Make sure you tune into this episode as I break down why the studies on the Gillet test aren’t the best and why I think the SI joint is innately difficult to assess with only one test.
Resources Mentioned In This Episode
Episode 6: The Mysterious, Misunderstood, and Mistreated SI Joint
Episode 10: EBP Police
Episode 54: A Better Way To Assess The SI Joint
Get on the Online LTAP™ Level 1 Waitlist HERE
Research Studies Mentioned
- Intertester Reliability for Selected Clinical Tests of the Sacroiliac Joint
- Inter- and Intra-Examiner Reliability of Palpation for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction
- Inter-Examiner and Intra-Examiner Agreement for Assessing Sacroiliac Anatomical Landmarks Using Palpation and Observation: Pilot Study
- Inter-Examiner and Intra-Examiner Reliability of the Standing Flexion Test
- Reliability of Motion Palpation Procedures to Detect Sacroiliac Joint Fixations
- Intraexaminer and Interexaminer Reliability of the Gillet Test
Upcoming In-Person LTAP™ Courses
LTAP Level 1 in Boston, October 2024

🚨 FREE mini-course: The Missing Link: Learn how ONE change to your assessment can help you get immediate results for your PT and AT clients.
In this training, you will:

  • Learn how to apply the 1st assessment test of the MovementREV LTAP™
  • Discover how to shift perspective from a biomechanical and orthopedic paradigm to a whole organism one that considers the viscera and the nervous system.

=================================================
Watch the podcast on YouTube and subscribe!
Join the MovementREV email list to stay up to date on the Unreal Results Podcast and MovementREV education.
Be social and follow me:
Instagram | Facebook | Twitter | YouTube

  continue reading

79 episódios

همه قسمت ها

×
 
Loading …

Bem vindo ao Player FM!

O Player FM procura na web por podcasts de alta qualidade para você curtir agora mesmo. É o melhor app de podcast e funciona no Android, iPhone e web. Inscreva-se para sincronizar as assinaturas entre os dispositivos.

 

Guia rápido de referências